Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A959FB1EF for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:50:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37098-01 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:50:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mailbox.samurai.com (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A019FA617 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:50:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82]) by mailbox.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EC361CA6; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:50:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailbox.samurai.com Received: from mailbox.samurai.com ([205.207.28.82]) by localhost (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id H5+MRz37Lk8O; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:50:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (d226-93-12.home.cgocable.net [24.226.93.12]) by mailbox.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853A861C7C; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:50:20 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Broken link in PG docs From: Neil Conway To: Gurjeet Singh Cc: PGSQL Hackers In-Reply-To: <65937bea0609250414s577abb00u73c217f808aa6318@mail.gmail.com> References: <65937bea0609250414s577abb00u73c217f808aa6318@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:50:21 -0400 Message-Id: <1159210221.10456.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200609/2018 X-Sequence-Number: 91546 On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 16:44 +0530, Gurjeet Singh wrote: > At the end of the following page: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/indexes-partial.html > > there is a link [Generalized Partial Indexes] which is pointing to a > missing link. I agree the link should be fixed, but I can't see another canonical location for the document online: linking to CiteSeer (which itself is generated from the mention in our online docs) is probably not wise. Can anyone find a good URL for this paper? -Neil