Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B769FB295; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:06:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81835-02; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:06:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com (63-246-7-171.contegix.com [63.246.7.171]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568D89FB2AE; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:06:11 -0300 (ADT) thread-index: Acb3uJahkhgzkHvGRjuT8QiB4tiAhA== Received: from [192.168.0.31] ([84.12.199.61]) by edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:05:59 -0400 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition From: "Simon Riggs" To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: "Markus Schiltknecht" , , , "Bruce Momjian" , "PostgreSQL-documentation" In-Reply-To: <453E6AB9.4000200@commandprompt.com> References: <200610240339.k9O3dYh19144@momjian.us> <200610241137.47486.josh@agliodbs.com> <453E681A.3000004@bluegap.ch> <453E6AB9.4000200@commandprompt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:05:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1161727538.3861.320.camel@silverbirch.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2006 22:05:59.0781 (UTC) FILETIME=[96826950:01C6F7B8] X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.855 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200610/51 X-Sequence-Number: 3772 On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 12:34 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Looking at that, I'm a) missing PgCluster and b) arguing that we have to > > admit that we simply can not 'list .. replication solutions ... and how > > to get them' because all of the solutions mentioned need quite some > > knowledge and require a more or less complex installation and > > configuration. > > There is also the question if we should have a sub section: > > Closed Source replication solutions: > > Mammoth Replicator > Continuent P/Cluster > ExtenDB > Greenplum MPP (although this is kind of horizontal partitioning) Where do you draw the line? You maybe surprised about what other options that includes. I'm happy to include a whole range of things, but please be very careful and precise about what you wish for. There's enough good solutions for open source PostgreSQL that it is easy and straightforward to limit it to just that. New contributions welcome, of course. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com