Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A906B9FA65C; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:04:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03129-04; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:04:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com (63-246-7-171.contegix.com [63.246.7.171]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5C09FA333; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:04:10 -0300 (ADT) thread-index: Acb3wLboG1p/x9M7RFGfyikbbKgmrg== Received: from [192.168.0.31] ([84.12.199.61]) by edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:04:09 -0400 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition From: "Simon Riggs" To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: "Markus Schiltknecht" , , , "Bruce Momjian" , "PostgreSQL-documentation" In-Reply-To: <453E949F.90004@commandprompt.com> References: <200610240339.k9O3dYh19144@momjian.us> <200610241137.47486.josh@agliodbs.com> <453E681A.3000004@bluegap.ch> <453E6AB9.4000200@commandprompt.com> <1161727538.3861.320.camel@silverbirch.site> <453E900E.4010603@commandprompt.com> <1161728414.3861.338.camel@silverbirch.site> <453E949F.90004@commandprompt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:03:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1161731029.3861.347.camel@silverbirch.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2006 23:04:09.0921 (UTC) FILETIME=[B6CB8310:01C6F7C0] X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.855 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200610/56 X-Sequence-Number: 3777 On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 15:33 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 15:13 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > >> If it were me, I would say that the replication option has to be > >> specific to PostgreSQL (e.g; cjdbc or synchronous jakarta pooling > >> doesn't go in). > > > > ...and how do you define PostgreSQL exactly? > > I replication product or software defined to work with only PostgreSQL? (again)... how do you define PostgreSQL exactly? -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com