Received: from localhost (uranus.hub.org [200.46.204.60]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59AC9FB272 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:08:32 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.60]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47363-09 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:08:31 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx4-p.vodamail.co.za (mx5.3g.vodacom.co.za [196.207.32.248]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26D29FB26B for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:08:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4-p.vodamail.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CF1433A for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:08:28 +0200 (SAST) Received: from mx4-p.vodamail.co.za ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4-p.vodamail.co.za [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32367-07 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:08:27 +0200 (SAST) Received: from josh.flame2.flame.co.za (unknown [10.53.195.126]) by mx4-p.vodamail.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A50C4311 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:08:26 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by josh.flame2.flame.co.za (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id kA8I7JGI002550 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:07:40 +0200 Subject: Documentation update for PQexecParams From: Theo Kramer Reply-To: theo@flame.co.za To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Flame Computing Enterprises cc Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:07:19 +0200 Message-Id: <1163009239.2384.2.camel@josh> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 (2.6.3-1.fc5.5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vodamail.co.za X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200611/3 X-Sequence-Number: 3837 Hi I have been using PQprepare() and PQexecPrepared(). This has led me to update libpq.sgml, in particular for PQexecParams(). The changes are to the formatting of the arguments for PQexecParams() (as shared by PQexecPrepared()) which make it easier to read, as well as creating a table giving a set of possible values for the various arguments with the associated SQL types. I would imagine the best place to submit the patch would be to psql-patches, however, before I do this I am wondering if this is the right forum for having the changes vetted before submitting the patch. Please advise. -- Regards Theo