public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Simon Riggs <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:14:49 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 15:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <[email protected]> writes:
> > The functionality in this area isn't yet complete anyway; we still have
> > locking in the partitioned table case to consider.
> 
> Hm?  What does partitioning have to do with it?

SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE is not supported for inheritance queries.

My point was that the implementation of row locking is not yet complete,
so the slight wrinkle around lock upgrading is not a solitary eyesore.

-- 
  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

view thread (32+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox