Subject: Re: Switching to XML
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>,
	Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>,
	Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org,
	David Blewett <david@dawninglight.net>
In-Reply-To: <200612101737.10958.peter_e@gmx.net>
References: <4579720E.4000707@dawninglight.net>
	<200612101008.10366.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<1165767023.13210.25.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<200612101737.10958.peter_e@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:51:24 -0800
Message-Id: <1165769484.13210.35.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 17:37 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I'm not stonewalling anything.  If someone wants to prepare a case for 
> moving to XML, be my guest.  I'm just here to debunk the reasons for 
> moving to XML which are wrong.
> 

O.k. how about this:

We want to move to XML. We have community members that want to move to
XML. We have regional projects that want to move to XML. 

You can not debunk any of those reasons.

The fact is, they want to.

Until you can come up with a reason why we *shouldn't* move to XML. I
believe this issue is settled.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate