Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4DD2E0F8F for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:56:52 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62560-10 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:56:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4DF2E072B for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:56:49 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAE1ukVN011708; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:56:46 -0500 (EST) To: Bruce Momjian cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation In-reply-to: <200711110442.lAB4gB824197@momjian.us> References: <200711110442.lAB4gB824197@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:42:10 -0500" Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:56:46 -0500 Message-ID: <11707.1195005406@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/46 X-Sequence-Number: 4579 Bruce Momjian writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I think there's a case for putting these pages under Part V Server >> Programming (though a few are not in fact server-side code), or under >> Part VI Reference (ignoring the fact that most of the text isn't in a >> uniform reference-page style ... though maybe we could plan to work >> towards that) or under Appendixes (though I'm sure there are people >> who will complain about that because their private agenda is to make >> these things as prominent as possible). Or we could make them a new >> top-level Part, probably just after Reference. > I think appendix is the right place myself. An argument in favor of that is that we've got External Projects as an appendix too, and it seems to make sense to put contrib next door to them. I'll go with that for the moment, and 'Additional Supplied Modules' as the title --- we can always change again later if there's a better idea. regards, tom lane