Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50009FCB62 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 00:49:16 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15846-04 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 00:49:04 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001B09FA362 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 00:49:03 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAB4mxmh011766; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:48:59 -0500 (EST) To: Bruce Momjian cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation In-reply-to: <200711110442.lAB4gB824197@momjian.us> References: <200711110442.lAB4gB824197@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:42:10 -0500" Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:48:59 -0500 Message-ID: <11765.1194756539@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/24 X-Sequence-Number: 4557 Bruce Momjian writes: >> BTW, why are neither contrib/dblink nor contrib/spi included in the >> conversion? > I see dblink: > http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/dblink.html Oh, in that case the question is why the contrib/db/doc/ files are still there. > I assume spi wasn't done because it is just examples of SPI usage. The .example files are fine, but what about the two README files? regards, tom lane