public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Simon Riggs <[email protected]>
To: Thomas F. O'Connell <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Incrementally Updated Backups: Docs Clarification
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:42:33 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 15:48 -0500, Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
> "If we take a backup of the standby server's files while it is
> following logs shipped from the primary, we will be able to reload
> that data and restart the standby's recovery process from the last
> restart point. We no longer need to keep WAL files from before the
> restart point. If we need to recover, it will be faster to recover
> from the incrementally updated backup than from the original base
> backup."
>
>
> I'm specifically confused about the meaning of the following phrases:
>
>
> "backup of the standby server's files" - Which files?
the files that make up the database server:
- data directory
- all tablespace directories
> "reload that data" - What does this mean in postgres terms?
copy back from wherever you put them in the first place
"that data" referring to the "files that make up the db server"
> "last restart point" - What is this? Wouldn't it be able to restart
> from the last recovered file, which would presumably occur later than
> the last restart point?
No, we don't restart file-by-file.
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-PITR-RECOVERY
"If recovery finds a corruption in the WAL..." onwards explains the
restart mechanism. It's much like checkpointing, so we don't restart
from the last log file we restart from a point possibly many log files
in the past.
> Does this mean make a filesystem backup of the standby server's data
> directory while it's stopped, and then start it again with that data
> and the restricted set of WAL files needed to continue recovery?
No need to stop server. Where do you read you need to do that?
> I'd like to see the language here converted to words that have more
> meaning in the context of postgres. I'd be happy to attempt a revision
> of this section once I'm able to complete an incrementally updated
> backup successfully.
Feel free to provide updates that make it clearer.
> Here's how I envision it playing out in practice:
>
>
> 1. stop standby postgres server
> 2. [optional] preserve data directory, remove unnecessary WAL files
> 3. restart standby server
step 2 only.
Clearly not an optional step, since its a 1 stage process. :-)
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
view thread (4+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Incrementally Updated Backups: Docs Clarification
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox