Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C602E168C
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:02:12 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 98550-04 for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:01:53 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51372E15CB
	for <pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:02:09 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAE2266A011781;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:02:06 -0500 (EST)
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
cc: pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:02:06 -0500
Message-ID: <11780.1195005726@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200711/47
X-Sequence-Number: 4580

Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a
good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ.

There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
Thoughts?

			regards, tom lane