Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1umKIh-00DhSh-ID for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 22:50:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1umKIf-000uYc-23 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 22:50:29 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1umKIe-000uYU-Pd for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 22:50:29 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1umKIc-000RAv-22 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 22:50:28 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 57DMoPAx011828; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 18:50:25 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Robert Treat cc: "David G. Johnston" , "nonint@yandex.ru" , "pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Tutorial from Chapter 2.1 In-reply-to: References: <175481702402.800.18232366789631838341@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <2637304.1754839284@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2640299.1754840899@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Treat message dated "Wed, 13 Aug 2025 18:40:20 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <11826.1755125425.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 18:50:25 -0400 Message-ID: <11827.1755125425@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Robert Treat writes: > Would it be easier enough to modify the existing bits to generate a > postgres tutorial extension that was distributed like the other > contrib modules in core? This would also give existing packagers a > simple way to make this available (or not) on their systems. Thoughts? Hmm, interesting idea. Making it fit into the contrib infrastructure would certainly go a long way towards getting packagers to package it. regards, tom lane