Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566239FCA9C; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:50:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64897-07-4; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:50:05 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C449F9461; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:49:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.44] (S010600a08330057a.ok.shawcable.net [24.67.72.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l9PJnS8p018685; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:49:28 -0700 Subject: Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres" From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= To: Bruce Momjian Cc: "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org" , "pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org" , Peter Eisentraut In-Reply-To: <200710252144.19874.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <200710251532.l9PFWTW09836@momjian.us> <200710252144.19874.peter_e@gmx.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9mNxmCt0h0RWND4Cu1WD" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:48:35 -0700 Message-Id: <1193341715.22012.84.camel@laptop.gunduz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-4.fc7) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/4593/Thu Oct 25 00:03:02 2007 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:49:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/103 X-Sequence-Number: 12767 --=-9mNxmCt0h0RWND4Cu1WD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 21:44 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > So, for the FAQ, which currently uses the second-entry-per-paragraph > > logic, should it be changed to the logic suggested above where every > > mention but the first is "Postgres"? (This will of course affect > the > > documentation changes when we are ready to discuss those.) >=20 > Just undo the whole thing. The project name is what it is.=20 +1. Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=9CND=C3=9CZ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/ --=-9mNxmCt0h0RWND4Cu1WD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHIPMRpme12CBXnxERAjxYAJ9D+JuS5nj/nwyZlUXaq8I81OnhtwCbBork MXQU+iL9funpH1EPr9FaMTg= =PuQo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9mNxmCt0h0RWND4Cu1WD--