Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FA09FCB5D for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 04:10:51 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85168-08-2 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 04:10:45 -0400 (AST) Received: from outmail136084.authsmtp.net (outmail136084.authsmtp.net [62.13.136.84]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7771F9FCB6C for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 04:10:44 -0400 (AST) Received: from outmail128185.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail128185.authsmtp.co.uk [62.13.128.185]) by punt2.authsmtp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Kp) with ESMTP id lA88AgLo082425 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 08:10:42 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.3] (85-211-24-246.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk [85.211.24.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Kp) with ESMTP id lA88AY5r033889 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 08:10:34 GMT Subject: Mentioning Slony in docs From: Simon Riggs To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:10:40 +0000 Message-Id: <1194509440.4251.180.camel@ebony.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server-Quench: 1524a830-8dd2-11dc-b86a-001185d377ca X-AuthRoute: OCdxZQATClZOTQEd DAteCiNZVAwpPBRK HVkIKg5MOFUSTAAU PkFRNXJLN0YASktU QCdXRQsWBxNxUXwL NExObwVdZVpOVw9r UEJKRxxaERtqAB0f BBoAUB10aAdDZ34+ OTdqVgEyWQZ6dkV1 SkcaE2gOK2ZlamRO WENYagsAJAFXfx4R OU0tXHVcfGUHZ3to QgNoYG86NCN6JSJJ QwYLLFQdCX0PGTgt DxEEVTkoFlZt X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633235383639.squirrel.dmpriest.net.uk:752/Kp X-Report-SPAM: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-Virus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system! X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/9 X-Sequence-Number: 4542 IMHO it would be appropriate to provide better links to Slony from within the Postgres docs. The main reason is that Slony is Copyrighted PGDG, so we own the code and it is of course BSD licenced. Now that this has been highlighted to me, I can't see a reason for the previous balanced approach. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com