Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310979FCB71 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 05:26:06 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03555-02 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 05:26:00 -0400 (AST) Received: from outmail137078.authsmtp.net (outmail137078.authsmtp.net [62.13.137.78]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4869FCB5B for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 05:26:00 -0400 (AST) Received: from outmail128180.authsmtp.com (outmail128180.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.180]) by punt4.authsmtp.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Kp) with ESMTP id lA89PwFm081372; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 09:25:58 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.3] (85-211-24-246.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk [85.211.24.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Kp) with ESMTP id lA89PtCU052403; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 09:25:55 GMT Subject: Re: Mentioning Slony in docs From: Simon Riggs To: Peter Eisentraut Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <200711081010.14464.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <1194509440.4251.180.camel@ebony.site> <200711081010.14464.peter_e@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:26:01 +0000 Message-Id: <1194513961.4251.193.camel@ebony.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server-Quench: 9b7e8cf1-8ddc-11dc-b86a-001185d377ca X-AuthRoute: OCdxZQATClZOTQEd DAteCiNZVAwpPBRK HVkIKg5MJUcNSQVJ NksadBtFaA1bY1ZH HGQLW1NEUFR7W2Z/ bg8fZQBDYEtPQQdu TkpNRE1QERpoT0Bw Dhd+FmoXdwBEfH5z K0diWnAVVRZ9IE4u FE9JHTlSNnphaTRM TRJQcVJJcANLfxdA PlN4UyBcLwdSbGoL MygYBAV5GDhZNCVS RAALIhopRUEND3Y9 QVgOGj40dXJf X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633235383639.squirrel.dmpriest.net.uk:752/Kp X-Report-SPAM: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-Virus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system! X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/11 X-Sequence-Number: 4544 On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 10:10 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 8. November 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs: > > The main reason is that Slony is Copyrighted PGDG, so we own the code > > and it is of course BSD licenced. > > Why is that a reason for mentioning it more prominently? It's not, I'm assuming you'd actually like to see it more prominent. My understanding was that we were trying to show equal favour to all of the various solutions. This was a reason not to do that. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com