Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B115E6332E7
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:54:06 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 78490-07 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:53:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB5D632F48
	for <pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:53:59 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o3TEruXw012065;
	Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:53:56 -0400 (EDT)
To: pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Subject: Why the separate jade calls for pdf and ps output?
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:53:56 -0400
Message-ID: <12064.1272552836@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.888 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=-0.877,
	BAYES_20=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201004/94
X-Sequence-Number: 5493

doc/src/sgml/Makefile asserts

# Regular TeX and pdfTeX have slightly differing requirements, so we
# need to distinguish the path we're taking.

However, diff'ing the results shows that the .tex-pdf and .tex-ps output
files are actually identical.  Would it be reasonable to simplify the
Makefile by eliminating the separate build rules?  I guess we'd have to
make an arbitrary choice between texdvi-output and texpdf-output flags.

			regards, tom lane