Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639CF476674 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:18:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F754760FA for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:18:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8UMInhR012135; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:18:50 -0400 (EDT) To: Peter Eisentraut Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Platform FAQs In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:40:49 +0200" Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:18:49 -0400 Message-ID: <12134.1033424329@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200209/42 X-Sequence-Number: 1494 Peter Eisentraut writes: > Tom Lane writes: >> I like the platform FAQ arrangement because it's simple to whip out >> a new platform FAQ based on notes from a port developer. > Yes, it's simple to whip out a new document and then forget about it. True :-(. Well, give it a shot and see how you like the results ... regards, tom lane