Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0OFQaq17752; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:26:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0OFQT912256; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:26:29 -0500 (EST) To: Vince Vielhaber cc: Bruce Momjian , Edwin Martin , pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01? In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Vince Vielhaber message dated "Wed, 24 Jan 2001 06:31:13 -0500" Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:26:29 -0500 Message-ID: <12253.980349989@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200101/128 X-Sequence-Number: 507 > On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> I noticed it does not mention 7.0.3. Must be some strange old version. >> Somone, please help explain this. That text agrees with what was in release.sgml back around July (see release.sgml version 1.57 ... ain't CVS wonderful?). That was after the 7.0.* branch-off. So what we have here is documents generated from the development tip that aren't being updated. Vince Vielhaber writes: > The /docs directory is where the docs used to be. I was about to remove > it when I noticed you guys were still maintaining FAQs and stuff in it. We should get rid of the out-of-date documents, for sure. Maybe put in a link to the ones that are kept up to date? regards, tom lane