Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0OFTdq18448;
	Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:29:39 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0OFTZ912277;
	Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:29:35 -0500 (EST)
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	Edwin Martin <e.j.martin@chello.nl>, pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org,
	PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01? 
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0101240718330.4905-100000@paprika.michvhf.com> 
References: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0101240718330.4905-100000@paprika.michvhf.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
	message dated "Wed, 24 Jan 2001 07:19:33 -0500"
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:29:34 -0500
Message-ID: <12274.980350174@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200101/129
X-Sequence-Number: 508

[Sorry, didn't see the rest of this thread right away]

Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com> writes:
> I turned the index page into a redirect so that should take care of the
> problem with the exception of pages in the stale docs that are bookmarked.

I'd vote for physically removing the old docs.  I'd rather people find
that their bookmark links are broken than that they continue to see
obsolete/incorrect docs ...

			regards, tom lane