Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sb7UY-00E5Ec-Tf for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 23:51:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sb7UX-00FotN-6O for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 23:51:53 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sb7UW-00FotB-Un for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 23:51:52 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sb7UU-003I9J-C0 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 23:51:51 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 475NpmJo1232656; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 19:51:48 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "David G. Johnston" cc: wombatbuddy@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: There is an invalid value for cidr type in the "Table 8.22. cidr Type Input Examples" In-reply-to: References: <172286815264.915373.10691480560464060561@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <1230606.1722900599@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to "David G. Johnston" message dated "Mon, 05 Aug 2024 16:42:53 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1232654.1722901908.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 19:51:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1232655.1722901908@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk "David G. Johnston" writes: > Another option, write: > "Same as input." > in the other two columns - so one doesn't have to look closely at some 30 > characters of hex to prove to themselves the inputs and outputs are indeed > identical. Oh, I like that, if it makes the table narrow enough. Probably need to set it in italics or something to make it obviously not-data. > Would do it elsewhere for consistency Right, we'd have to do it in each entry of this table (that it is correct for). regards, tom lane