X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F412D1DF5D for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 02:27:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54894-04 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 02:27:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFB9D1DCF5 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 02:27:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3F5RdEk012433; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 01:27:40 -0400 (EDT) To: Bruce Momjian Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: Clarification of DateStyle In-reply-to: <200404150447.i3F4l1E13931@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <200404150447.i3F4l1E13931@candle.pha.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:47:01 -0400" Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 01:27:39 -0400 Message-ID: <12432.1082006859@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200404/9 X-Sequence-Number: 2353 Bruce Momjian writes: > I have applied the following patch to clarify the meaning of the second > DateStyle field. Am I seeing correctly that this is actually just a one-word insertion? You do your readers no favor by providing patches for comment that consist largely of content-free rearrangement of line breaks. regards, tom lane