Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1208C633F9C for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:03:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52584-06 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 00:03:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7845C633ECD for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:03:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o310332s001252; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:03:03 -0400 (EDT) To: Bruce Momjian cc: Josh Kupershmidt , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: confusing archive_command example In-reply-to: <201003312351.o2VNpFd25456@momjian.us> References: <201003312351.o2VNpFd25456@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:51:14 -0400" Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:03:03 -0400 Message-ID: <1251.1270080183@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.599 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201003/29 X-Sequence-Number: 5394 Bruce Momjian writes: > His complaint was that .../%f looks like ../%f; is that a valid > concern? Well, it does look like it, I'm just not seeing an easy fix that makes that better. I think the original suggestion was to turn it into a concrete example by writing something like /mnt/archive/%f. > I have reverted the change. Also, should we be using test ! > -e instead of -f? No opinion. regards, tom lane