Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F138E632B07 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 02:26:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10949-01 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 05:26:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9B1B632C7A for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 02:25:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Apr 2010 05:25:27 -0000 Received: from a88-115-218-165.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [10.0.0.101]) [88.115.218.165] by mail.gmx.net (mp071) with SMTP; 01 Apr 2010 07:25:27 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18QHL47EgQQmHh+UAcyEDadcAixPqX1DotEdIaDdL 6EKmqEbtbBBbEM Subject: Re: confusing archive_command example From: Peter Eisentraut To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Tom Lane , Josh Kupershmidt , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <201003312351.o2VNpFd25456@momjian.us> References: <201003312351.o2VNpFd25456@momjian.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:25:24 +0300 Message-ID: <1270099524.10696.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.77000000000000002 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.338 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=-0.598, BAYES_20=-0.74 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201004/1 X-Sequence-Number: 5400 On ons, 2010-03-31 at 19:51 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Also, should we be using test ! -e instead of -f? test -e is not portable.