Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F332E17F6
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:28:22 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 42104-06 for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:28:09 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60BF2E15CB
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:28:15 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAE3SBQX012706;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:28:12 -0500 (EST)
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation 
In-reply-to: <20071113191704.79e0bfb0@scratch> 
References: <11780.1195005726@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20071113191704.79e0bfb0@scratch>
Comments: In-reply-to "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
	message dated "Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:17:04 -0800"
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:28:11 -0500
Message-ID: <12705.1195010891@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200711/49
X-Sequence-Number: 4582

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a
>> good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ.
>> 
>> There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
>> which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
>> correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
>> Thoughts?

> There are some references in the main docs too last I checked. I can
> submit a patch in the next day.

I think I already got everything except the items mentioned above.

			regards, tom lane