Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F19F63280F for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 23:09:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82711-10 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 02:09:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE2596323B2 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 23:09:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Jul 2010 02:09:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [192.168.0.4]) [204.210.253.91] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 03 Jul 2010 04:09:35 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19TcgcNiiBTWmUkKxwq/ltJBC76oVzyXunOraQLqO GBVUqa5By7C72n Subject: Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams From: Peter Eisentraut To: Robert Haas Cc: Bruce Momjian , "Marc G. Fournier" , Tom Lane , Alvaro Herrera , Rafael Martinez , pgsql-docs In-Reply-To: References: <201007022207.o62M7mX02724@momjian.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:09:25 -0400 Message-ID: <1278122965.25901.10.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.51 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201007/24 X-Sequence-Number: 5680 On fre, 2010-07-02 at 19:02 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Is it at all practical to ship the PNGs as well as the DIA files in > CVS, and make rebuilding the PNGs from the DIAs a separate step? Well, that's what we're arguing about here. > Also, I think we need to review these images carefully before adding > any of them into our docs. That's another matter. I'm not convinced that all of the images are useful.