Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FE5632CAF for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:36:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49419-06 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:36:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 914A163223B for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:36:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2010 17:36:29 -0000 Received: from a88-115-218-165.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [10.0.0.101]) [88.115.218.165] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 19:36:29 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+AwlYQ4EqAjvwmZvVGSLaGC+qQmeJUSc2LuUWh9D zZKzWMtLFYOKgS Subject: Re: Ambiguous index entry for Privileges From: Peter Eisentraut To: Thom Brown Cc: pgsql-docs In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:36:27 +0300 Message-ID: <1282066587.25113.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201008/51 X-Sequence-Number: 5875 On tor, 2010-08-12 at 00:05 +0100, Thom Brown wrote: > I noticed that there are 2 linked entries for "Privileges": > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/bookindex.html#AEN128982 > > While they both go to different pages (with admittedly very similar > content), those pages are both entitled "Privileges" so it's unclear > from the index which page you'll end up at. Can we rename one of > those pages to clarify as it looks weird in the index. In general, you could also make one of the indexterms significance="preferred", which will make it italic. Not sure if that is appropriate here.