Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DBD632B10
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:12:38 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 45071-01 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:12:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86A93632585
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:12:30 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2010 19:12:28 -0000
Received: from a88-115-218-165.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [10.0.0.101])
	[88.115.218.165]
	by mail.gmx.net (mp050) with SMTP; 29 Aug 2010 21:12:28 +0200
X-Authenticated: #495269
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19/xsEdq/B/TtL+9Gc5lr6/1dt3iYazfN+d5Vfvuj
	8J47cSaBvfnb18
Subject: Re: SGML on functions
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin11J7Fx=EXRfh1n4k6bhh9QWGSPE4N9_Vym1dZ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=cLJcfZo_oMFFrRveiOyCVz1DcPhizqgLbJ7rJ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin11J7Fx=EXRfh1n4k6bhh9QWGSPE4N9_Vym1dZ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:12:26 +0300
Message-ID: <1283109146.18527.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201008/131
X-Sequence-Number: 5955

On fre, 2010-08-27 at 21:57 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> I've also noticed that a lot of the <screen> contents are indented as
> part of the markup, but when output in HTML, each space it recreated
> as it ends up in either <code> or <pre> tags.
> 
> <programlisting> contents seem to have been intentionally entered so
> that they break with the indenting style so they're output correctly.
> Shouldn't tags such as <screen> follow the same style so that they can
> also avoid unintentional leading whitespace?

I don't really know what you mean here.  Do you have an example?