Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E44B632585
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:13:07 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 08323-01 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:12:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC115632DD5
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:12:58 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2010 19:12:56 -0000
Received: from a88-115-218-165.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [10.0.0.101])
	[88.115.218.165]
	by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 29 Aug 2010 21:12:56 +0200
X-Authenticated: #495269
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19A6Mg4d5RAXLxo5Oi65ozJyHsZe2exG4VnSiTHAT
	zeoBjUIMLcHk4M
Subject: Re: SGML on functions
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=cLJcfZo_oMFFrRveiOyCVz1DcPhizqgLbJ7rJ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=cLJcfZo_oMFFrRveiOyCVz1DcPhizqgLbJ7rJ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:12:55 +0300
Message-ID: <1283109175.18527.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201008/132
X-Sequence-Number: 5956

On fre, 2010-08-27 at 19:56 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> E.g.:
> 
> <function>variance</function>(<replaceable
> class="parameter">expression</replaceable>)
> 
> vs
> 
> <function>stddev_samp(<replaceable
> class="parameter">expression</replaceable>)</function>
> 
> Which way is correct?

"Correct" is a strong word in such matters, but I prefer the latter
version.