Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F041337B4F
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:09:51 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 59795-02 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:09:40 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 722251336FA7
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:09:39 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2010 12:09:38 -0000
Received: from a88-115-218-165.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [10.0.0.101])
	[88.115.218.165]
	by mail.gmx.net (mp043) with SMTP; 23 Sep 2010 14:09:38 +0200
X-Authenticated: #495269
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/YqJlTyVrYzBTo+aVMR7/AfmMHvqUkOGy3gLwuC/
	4uIeRGnr6xWj7R
Subject: Re: Capitalization of "PL/pgSQL"
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian
	<bruce@momjian.us>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik2FYPS4dkKWcVDZyiNht9N3Tr=kBD-Hx59ALQa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=2GWM15Zc7R9+4QN29euqnK4_GM4k3K9rG37ST@mail.gmail.com>
	<201009230106.o8N161Q17999@momjian.us>
	<AANLkTinyfWhyGFvNEZ+-dpzk4xoMgONw1cRMYaGfxdA3@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik2FYPS4dkKWcVDZyiNht9N3Tr=kBD-Hx59ALQa@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:09:36 +0300
Message-ID: <1285243776.27917.15.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201009/111
X-Sequence-Number: 6101

On ons, 2010-09-22 at 22:00 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Not back-patching, so as to avoid creating unnecessary work
> for translators.

Probably not worth backpatching anyway ... but the patch doesn't
actually touch anything translatable.