Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG Documentation Improvement
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>, Lars Nordin
	<lars.nordin@gmail.com>, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org,
	pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <4C51AAFA.7090601@gmail.com>
References: <4C19E5B9.3040002@gmail.com> <4C359F7B.3020604@gmail.com>
	<4C47E6BF.8020901@gmail.com> <201007272142.31334.lars.nordin@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimyUPQE90zbS5e=QTvsZj8aarGYr47no=KV4W5v@mail.gmail.com>
	<27340.1280363314@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20100729084136.GA1016@feivel.credativ.lan>
	<4C51AAFA.7090601@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:32:37 +0300
Message-ID: <1285511557.1601.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On fre, 2010-07-30 at 01:23 +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> I'm thinking about taking a few weeks after August or September
> to review and merge the document intensively (like CommitFest)
> by some developers who are interested in this doc.
> 
> I know this change is very huge, and it's very difficult to review
> and give feedback through the whole document. So I think we sould take
> an approach to review and merge chapter by chapter during the period,
> and it can be an effective way to merge this large change
> if we can take time for such intensive work.
> 
> Is this possible? Any suggestions?

If you want this reviewed, please send in a patch of the source code you
changed.