Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DAE1337999 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:04:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76409-08 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:04:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C91E1336FA7 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:04:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2010 11:04:35 -0000 Received: from a88-115-218-165.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [10.0.0.101]) [88.115.218.165] by mail.gmx.net (mp040) with SMTP; 29 Sep 2010 13:04:35 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+MDQMTPgyMaa4DmEIYEgKel1OMeemX6qzswC/mE2 3PfRWiEAkh1nGx Subject: Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual From: Peter Eisentraut To: Satoshi Nagayasu Cc: pgsql-docs In-Reply-To: <4CA15534.1060602@gmail.com> References: <4C4847D0.9030001@gmail.com> <4C602E9D.40501@gmail.com> <4C60C7A9.10307@gmail.com> <4C634586.7090908@gmail.com> <1285502270.1601.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <4CA11FF7.1090403@gmail.com> <4CA13D11.7050905@gmail.com> <4CA1458F.9030707@2ndquadrant.com> <4CA15534.1060602@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:04:32 +0300 Message-ID: <1285758272.25458.17.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201009/144 X-Sequence-Number: 6134 On tis, 2010-09-28 at 11:38 +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: > On 2010/09/28 10:31, Greg Smith wrote: > > If the patch you generated applies to the git version of the repo cleanly, you may be fine for now. The anon-cvs version is mainly intended as a source to get a copy of the source code just to compile or read, not to develop patches against. For that it would be better to switch to git when you get some time to spend on that. > > So, I have created another patch from git repository. > The attached one could be applied to the latest code. Committed, with some adjustments. Notably, you probably misinterpreted the meaning of the -600 error code from the comment in header file. Also, the -600 and -601 codes are not generated by the current code at all, so I have commented them out in the documentation.