Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AB41337B97; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:33:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52443-06; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:33:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail149101.authsmtp.com (outmail149101.authsmtp.com [62.13.149.101]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D3D1337B93; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:33:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail-c187.authsmtp.com (mail-c187.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.33]) by punt5.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Kp) with ESMTP id o9EIXTME006854; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:33:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.5] ([81.5.146.37]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o9EIXPUN079144; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:33:25 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Docs for archive_cleanup_command are poor From: Simon Riggs To: Brendan Jurd Cc: Fujii Masao , Robert Haas , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:33:24 +0100 Message-ID: <1287081204.1725.1094.camel@ebony> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server-Quench: 88658e0c-d7c1-11df-ab46-001185d377ca X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCdxZQATClZOTQEd DAteCiN5VAwpPBRK HVkIKg5MJUcNSQVJ NksacxtFaQFbYlpF HGQLWlREUVR7WmB/ aQwfZQRDZ1RPWwN0 U09WR1pVCwUmXhV0 f3Z+N2dycAxHfHo+ YEFhWz5TVEJ/fRN9 EVMAEj4HeGZhPDYC ARJccR5UcAJLdhoR aVd4ByJDAzANdhEY NiQQEgoKCH1zLy9O Cg8KNxobW00LHyAx cBsGEDwpAFUyTCI2 KhUgJhYVBktZKkI1 KzMA X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633235383639.1000:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201010/27 X-Sequence-Number: 6168 On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 02:24 +1100, Brendan Jurd wrote: > I'll drop this onto the next open commitfest. If it passes muster, it > sure wouldn't hurt to backpatch it to 9.0. Committed. Not sure there's anything there worth backpatching? There aren't any doc bugs there. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services