Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Docs for archive_cleanup_command are poor
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
	pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <5681.1287093948@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <AANLkTin7HkSNoXimB5XQq69Wnw4a04oBSM1EiRGEOTZ3@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=Lx4S-5udAkh6T=Fcan9xpvkHAJdZ2hXrq2OcG@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikdBWvvx=ZFvmqoVWeCF+Dyka_doPkAxkKw7J=b@mail.gmail.com>
	<1287081204.1725.1094.camel@ebony>
	<AANLkTimiQrsWrc3eyiP91QnxPDwEqx=X7wwRuFxKC8rF@mail.gmail.com>
	<5681.1287093948@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:20:51 +0100
Message-ID: <1287134451.1725.1301.camel@ebony>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 18:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
> > Agreed that there are no doc bugs.  The reason I suggested a backpatch
> > is that I'm concerned that a lot of people are going to be approaching
> > the whole Standby topic for the first time with 9.0, so it would be
> > nice to give those folks an accessible account of how
> > archive_cleanup_command is meant to be used.
> 
> Yeah, if this is a material improvement in the usefulness of the HS
> docs, I think including it into 9.0.x isn't a bad idea.

Done.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services