Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52F01336B42
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:04:39 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 63889-01 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:04:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A193A1337B9A
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:04:27 -0400 (AST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2010 22:04:26 -0000
Received: from a88-115-218-165.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [10.0.0.101])
	[88.115.218.165]
	by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 23 Nov 2010 23:04:26 +0100
X-Authenticated: #495269
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+x3tsl0UyxCkP4KaMuTWwGjR8nu0oVmIS3ksd65L
	zQ+9QNTGkq7YSj
Subject: Re: Additional index entries and table sorting
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikcrUfRB=T4dQNNCbnGKYxLv1XZTwUwAbL0hxqZ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimUnynhY26SLUQW2_FpeG3Y-fgqmTwND8pUmvQt@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikDJ_7fsPhjLjMLTLSBWsX=WfUzXFgeMAyN2R53@mail.gmail.com>
	<1288292363.30480.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
	<AANLkTi=sd+OUQ1AOnEpaTbQsUVqrgE5MnAD1NVd7takD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikcrUfRB=T4dQNNCbnGKYxLv1XZTwUwAbL0hxqZ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:04:23 +0200
Message-ID: <1290549863.24521.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201011/33
X-Sequence-Number: 6231

On fre, 2010-11-05 at 22:33 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 28 October 2010 20:15, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> >
> > It was already inconsistent in the SGML, but if you wish, I'll redo it so
> > that they're all in tables.  That will mean taking the sections which kept
> > index terms outside of tables already, and merging them with all the tables.
> >  Will take me a while.
> 
> 
> Okay, here's another version, moving index entries back from separate lists
> into function tables, although I think I've done that for more than just my
> own changes.

Committed