Subject: Re: This Newbie is looking at pdf documentation
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Leslie S Satenstein <lsatenstein@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <516271.10021.qm@web110709.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <516271.10021.qm@web110709.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:42:00 +0200
Message-ID: <1293302520.12491.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On lör, 2010-12-25 at 06:33 -0800, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
> I could post in this email, some before after changes, but those would
> be my perceptions.  I was shown to use GIT with SGL but I am reviewing
> the PDF, and therefore the determination of the corresponding SGL is a
> lot of work. 

Perhaps you can think of some other way to mark changes in a PDF
document that someone else can then review and process further, keeping
in mind that most of us like to work with open-source tools.

> What I was after was a to be advised how to arrange peer review of
> some changes that I felt were touchups to the documentation. How to
> identify these peers and to get my recommended touchups to them, as
> well as feedback.

This mailing list is your peer. :-)  Send your things here.