Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298491337B93 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:43:53 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24576-07 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:43:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com (host-215.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.215]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8260C1337B82 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:43:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE61348046; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:43:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at commandprompt.com Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spinlock.commandprompt.com.commandprompt.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gaN6THEBADPa; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:43:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (unknown [190.95.20.220]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6CD5348022; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:43:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 089336E5AA; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:43:31 -0300 (CLST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: Improve initdb and pg_controldata manual pages From: Alvaro Herrera To: Leslie S Satenstein In-reply-to: <59974.87985.qm@web110707.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <59974.87985.qm@web110707.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:43:31 -0300 Message-Id: <1299767607-sup-5201@alvh.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Sup/git Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201103/58 X-Sequence-Number: 6491 Excerpts from Leslie S Satenstein's message of mié mar 09 22:43:19 -0300 2011: > I have to agree with Bruce M. that the docs are in need of some work. > I think there are two or more viewpoints. I don't think you're going to find anyone to state that the docs are perfect. Most people will say that they're “pretty good”, but agree that improvements are still possible. > The docs should contain the detailed information concerning postgresql > functions, with no omissions. No disagreement on this, but maybe there are corner cases. > The docs should be well formatted so that the PDF files created are > clear and understandable. No disagreement on this either. I was even thinking a couple of days ago that it might be good to have PDFs in other page sizes, smaller than A4; say a typical book size. That would perhaps display better on a ebook reader. (On the readers I've seen, full-page PDFs are annoying to browse: fonts are too small, or you have to scroll). Also, we still have program output, tables or code samples that are too wide to fit a page. Those need to be fixed too. Another thing I've considered is to format Postgres table output as Docbook tables instead of ASCII art. Perhaps that would render better. But that needs to be explored. (And of course psql would need a docbook output mode to facilitate doc writing). > The docs need consistency, so that the information therein is not > misconstrued by an English speaking / reading non-American.  The > documentation has many many grammar mistakes, where pronouns refer back > to more than one noun, or adverbs refer to more than one verb.  I found > the authors mean very well, but they mix usage based on programming > thoughts.   Fields give, instead of contains, is one example.  Here is > a context to illustrate. Not being a native english speaker, I can't help you here. -- Álvaro Herrera The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support