Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750ED1337BD9 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:49:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63305-09 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:49:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50BB91337BD1 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:49:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Apr 2011 18:49:04 -0000 Received: from a88-115-218-165.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [10.0.0.101]) [88.115.218.165] by mail.gmx.net (mp056) with SMTP; 05 Apr 2011 20:49:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18JT7xGf3IJh/X3+ns9sWN5pkc3ebc5PyZJy9fcxG 58sTOxIFt5yxir Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations From: Peter Eisentraut To: Susanne Ebrecht Cc: Tom Lane , Gabriele Bartolini , Robert Haas , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL-development In-Reply-To: <4D99FF55.9070301@2ndQuadrant.com> References: <4D998B49.8050000@2ndQuadrant.it> <4D99F09D.3000606@2ndQuadrant.it> <1503.1301935044@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4D99FF55.9070301@2ndQuadrant.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:48:55 +0300 Message-ID: <1302029335.27487.20.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.909 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201104/46 X-Sequence-Number: 6617 On mån, 2011-04-04 at 19:26 +0200, Susanne Ebrecht wrote: > Honestly, for German I don't mind yet if it is XML or SGML. XML might > be better in future for maintenance tools. > > Anyway, I figured out there is another argument for XML: > > My information is that DocBook 5.0 won't support SGML anymore. > > Which means - sooner or later a reaction is needed. In the spirit of CVS_to_Git, I have started this page now: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Switching_PostgreSQL_documentation_from_SGML_to_XML Edit away.