Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BB3B5DBC8 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 09:16:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40604-02 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 12:16:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com (host-215.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.215]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7230BB5DBC1 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 09:16:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101AB348045; Fri, 20 May 2011 05:16:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at commandprompt.com Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spinlock.commandprompt.com.commandprompt.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gejLg08k0-Ng; Fri, 20 May 2011 05:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (unknown [200.85.213.137]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 885A7348044; Fri, 20 May 2011 05:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C8F4A6E35C; Fri, 20 May 2011 08:16:19 -0400 (CLT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-docs Subject: Re: non-ASCII characters in SGML documentation (and elsewhere) From: Alvaro Herrera To: Tom Lane In-reply-to: <8242.1305892618@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <1305841740.3952.32.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <8242.1305892618@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 08:16:19 -0400 Message-Id: <1305893700-sup-7077@alvh.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Sup/git Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201105/68 X-Sequence-Number: 6743 Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie may 20 07:56:58 -0400 2011: > Peter Eisentraut writes: > > * Should we consistently use entities for encoding non-ASCII > > characters in SGML? Or use LATIN1 freely? > > I think we previously discussed this and agreed that all non-ASCII in > the SGML docs should be written as entities. The existence of > violations of that rule is just, well, a violation that ought to be > fixed. +1 > > * Should we allow/use non-ASCII characters in the release notes? > > * What encoding should the HISTORY file have? > > Ideally "sure, if entity-ified", but I don't know what to do about > HISTORY. Can we recode that to plain ascii? I think iconv has a //TRANSLIT flag or something like that. -- Álvaro Herrera The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support