Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473CEB6323E
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sat,  4 Jun 2011 16:12:25 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 01960-08 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sat,  4 Jun 2011 19:12:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFAEAB63238
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sat,  4 Jun 2011 16:12:17 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Jun 2011 19:12:15 -0000
Received: from a88-115-218-165.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [10.0.0.101])
	[88.115.218.165]
	by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 04 Jun 2011 21:12:15 +0200
X-Authenticated: #495269
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19Du5oI+i9Ds4iTg3yl7dwvd5Hzte8iiayaQ2FM4a
	xKAb1jVG+cKLUq
Subject: Re: ECPG, sentence not complete
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>
Cc: Marc Cousin <cousinmarc@gmail.com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <4DE923A8.2080003@gmail.com>
References: <4DE8A66B.60904@gmail.com>  <4DE923A8.2080003@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:12:14 +0300
Message-ID: <1307214734.3856.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.909 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201106/15
X-Sequence-Number: 6789

On lör, 2011-06-04 at 03:10 +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 2011/06/03 18:16, Marc Cousin wrote:
> > Hi, we're translating the ecpg.xml from scratch in french, as it seems
> > to have moved a lot with 9.0 and 9.1.
> >
> > I'm having trouble with this:
> >
> > 3948<term><literal>desc_next</></term>
> > 3949<listitem>
> > 3950<para>
> > 3951         If the query returns more than one records, multiple linked
> > SQLDA structures
> > 3952         are returned, the first record is stored in the SQLDA
> > returned in the
> > 3953</para>
> > 3954</listitem>
> >
> > Seems to me there are some words missing, but maybe it's a continuation
> > to the next paragraph. Anyway I don't want to guess what should be
> > there, so if anyone can explain this to me :)
> 
> This problem has been living since 9.0 or before.
> 
> I think it should be rewritten as following:
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> If the query returns more than one records, multiple linked
> SQLDA structures are returned, and <literal>desc_next</>
> holds a pointer to the next element (record) in the list.
> ---------------------------------------------------------

Fixed.