Message-ID: <1333042286.4554.13.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
Subject: Re: Adding links to alternate versions of doc pages
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Alvaro Herrera
	<alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>, Pg
	Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:31:26 +0300
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+OCxoyGicFAZ1pyZtEFH9MXN3vnSGme4L2jY4zKAop+tEnEAw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c41530319bdd609c82be6010ab9a5183@biglumber.com>
	<1332958954-sup-332@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<CABUevEzJenf14HaO2xVqwc=wXtdhJpE_9hu_nuMqefbH9C3n+w@mail.gmail.com>
	<1333040870.4554.10.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
	<CA+OCxoyGicFAZ1pyZtEFH9MXN3vnSGme4L2jY4zKAop+tEnEAw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0

On tor, 2012-03-29 at 18:12 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > A related problem: At least a search on Google will usually find the
> > documentation of some old version.  A search on Bing, however, doesn't
> > find the documentation at all.  That indicates to me that there is
> > something seriously wrong in how the web site is constructed.
> 
> Works for me. Aside from the version issue, I get very relevant results for
> a few test searches on Bing.

Hmm, interesting.  I tried the example given at the beginning of this
thread "postgresql maintenance_work_mem", which didn't work so well.
("postgres maintenance_work_mem" is even worse.)  Other searches appear
to work better and in most cases even prefer the current documentation
link.

Still, the overall quality of the results is quite bad.