Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F546FED3
	for <pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:40:14 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23])
	by makus.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <peter_e@gmx.net>) id 1Sh69j-0002Pw-IV
	for pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:40:13 +0000
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2012 21:39:57 -0000
Received: from a88-115-214-103.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [10.0.0.103])
	[88.115.214.103]
	by mail.gmx.net (mp019) with SMTP; 19 Jun 2012 23:39:57 +0200
X-Authenticated: #495269
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18D7HdTMBMD1KsKV1k8DH/SoVHpk/97I/Y7hcy9nj
	bojfahdTLcOWDd
Message-ID: <1340141992.26286.30.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
Subject: Re: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:39:52 +0300
In-Reply-To: <4FDB796A.7080803@agliodbs.com>
References: <4FDB796A.7080803@agliodbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1+b1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Archive-Number: 201206/8
X-Sequence-Number: 7367

On fre, 2012-06-15 at 11:05 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> Way it is now:

> The way it should be:

This would be easier to process if you had sent a diff.