Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1A1ZYx53088 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 20:35:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1A1ZQ913431; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 20:35:27 -0500 (EST) To: Peter Eisentraut cc: Vince Vielhaber , PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: Reference manual In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Sat, 10 Feb 2001 01:46:00 +0100" Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 20:35:26 -0500 Message-ID: <13428.981768926@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200102/42 X-Sequence-Number: 297 Peter Eisentraut writes: >> So why the sudden desire to change things? > You said: "This new index also doesn't match the website, it's like you > left and went elsewhere", which I interpreted as that you would like the > docs to match the web site's look and feel, to which I agree. Here's a vote for leaving the docs the way they are, at least in that respect. I don't *want* a bunch of sidebar clutter when I'm trying to read docs; I want all the screen space I can get for the useful text. regards, tom lane