Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1S3c-0002Ce-IK for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:06:00 +0000 Received: from mail-gh0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1S3W-0001U9-E5 for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:05:58 +0000 Received: by ghrr11 with SMTP id r11so1218757ghr.19 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:05:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=BajkcLAgRQoqlClkBgsOGCbTRUvCyTUV/yXCqxV+Epo=; b=TmhYS0HWoUwmBxk4kxllgvxLPZRd8TcBUpSOQMu7Rg1FYkTfaQGzUypO1FqsKO+eeA vlBTMhMwWWhPbH7wCq0IZp0coHH9ByUwyd/OAUGN3CjO6Rv9VMxUPew6Z0dbcvI6+psB 8sJuBykXmbFIMPWfpojJxbrEbS+gdRZmXVFgAeSbeGpv7dJYmQL98KfK7lU1FyGM5F50 7zvrhhDd2+K+DRabbmaJr48MvwUUPhwyo3rqwyDYqlxCY2R18TwKrC4F9lWT8LEJzmSI khznivIf4qwS80O/saq0ZlwcrbZIJ0RG95AdXu1vR4r1aZ2LEcWSNJMoZWR0qb0qJdiI xX7Q== Received: by 10.236.170.106 with SMTP id o70mr17989984yhl.10.1344992752427; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:::1? ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe93:2ae4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o5sm4320811anm.17.2012.08.14.18.05.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:05:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Confusion over "This page in other versions" links From: Jeff Davis To: Heikki Linnakangas Cc: pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org In-Reply-To: <502A293E.70403@enterprisedb.com> References: <502A293E.70403@enterprisedb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:05:48 -0700 Message-ID: <1344992748.25533.31.camel@sussancws0025> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkvwE0XX7UyKJ2KCteiaE9FQEnl4l3WUFN1P4Y4HQU79B6K9Ce3bm+BYTqxBHIPSjNeakyE X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201208/16 X-Sequence-Number: 7409 On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 13:32 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > I just had a discussion with someone off-list, where he was looking at > the documentation page of a contrib module at www.postgresql.org/docs. > Looking at the page, he came to the conclusion that the module was no > longer supported in 9.2, because the header at the top of the page said: > > "This page in other versions: 9.1 / 9.0 / 8.4 / 8.3 | Unsupported > versions: 9.2 / devel" > > I find the links really helpful, but apparently they can be > misunderstood. Perhaps we should change the "Unsupported versions" text > to "future versions" or "Development versions". Or change "9.2" to "9.2 > (beta)", and remove the "Unsupported versions" text altogether. Or perhaps: "This document for version: 9.1 / 9.0 / 8.4 / 8.3 | devel / 9.2 (beta) | Old versions: 8.2 / 8.1 / ..." I didn't read the original rationale, but it's not clear to me why we have quick links to the documents for unsupported versions. Maybe just have one link "unsupported versions" that goes to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/archive/ ? Regards, Jeff Davis