Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F62537C6A9; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:04:24 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43747-02; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:04:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7214537BA29; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:04:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lACN4Dx1013607; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:04:13 -0500 (EST) To: josh@agliodbs.com cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [DOCS] Avoiding upgrade backlash In-reply-to: <200711121442.31233.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <200711121442.31233.josh@agliodbs.com> Comments: In-reply-to Josh Berkus message dated "Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:42:30 -0800" Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:04:12 -0500 Message-ID: <13606.1194908652@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/53 X-Sequence-Number: 12870 Josh Berkus writes: > While we are right to choke down abuse of implicit casting, it might be a > good idea to give users stronger warnings and instructions. > I'm thinking that we need to warn everyone about: > 1) They need to use 8.3's pg_dump, not the old version, to upgrade (this is > always true but now doing it wrong will break a lot more users). Uh, what makes you think that will make any difference? > 3) If Robert gets his type-cast backport package together, the location of > that. The very *last* thing I want to see is encouragement of people trying to undo that change. regards, tom lane