Message-ID: <1361738797.819.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Contrib module "xml2" status
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Magnus Hagander
	<magnus@hagander.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-docs
	<pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:46:37 -0500
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAB8KJ=gXZtmEQUwcW5z0uTETncYsxr6WuaGd7QNqbsQ+-bRDfQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAB8KJ=jzPCM2BT8KcoNnydzPFk-rMvKWP99WNXegW3bWaeu7pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+TgmoZkD+HVkNTEHLUKMwVB79_yTLk40v-ve=QSyugaLJh2sQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABUevEyPUp6aP2svQmvCUHBN=_2pqA+JobrdLqWCHHj1+fbwkg@mail.gmail.com>
	<51266223.803@dunslane.net>
	<CAB8KJ=gXZtmEQUwcW5z0uTETncYsxr6WuaGd7QNqbsQ+-bRDfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 08:25 +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> 2013/2/22 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>:
> >
> > On 02/21/2013 12:56 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick
> >>> <barwick@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not sure if this is a documentation or hackers issue, but the
> >>>> documentation page for contrib module "xml2" refers to PostgreSQL 8.4 in
> >>>> the
> >>>> future tense:
> >>>>
> >>>>     "It is planned that this module will be removed in PostgreSQL 8.4 in
> >>>> favor of the newer standard API"
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/xml2.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Are there any plans to remove this module by a forseeable date?
> >>>
> >>> Nope.  I have repeatedly been voted down on removing it, and I've also
> >>> been repeatedly voted down on removing the deprecation text.  Could we
> >>> at least agree on changing the deprecation text to say "This module is
> >>> deprecated and may be removed in a future release"?
> >>
> >> Not reopening the actual discussion about rmeoving it, but assuming
> >> we're not, strong +1 on changing the deprecation message. And don't
> >> forget to backpatch the change so it shows up in the old versions of
> >> the docs as well.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Yes, we should change it to remove the reference to 8.4.
> 
> Documentation patch attached.

done


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers