Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UpUTq-00068t-2G for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:20:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UpUTp-0007bk-Gs for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:20:09 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UpUTo-0007bc-Ul for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:20:09 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UpUTl-0002E2-NE for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:20:08 +0000 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.27]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M1kqC-1U0Pzq1mji-00tmwR for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:20:04 +0200 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2013 02:20:04 -0000 Received: from pool-108-2-72-47.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (EHLO [192.168.1.8]) [108.2.72.47] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 20 Jun 2013 04:20:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19+biJxw4t+buL+PdLELWJBnBUqs+SjOEsaX07VZd jngSdq7vgH80Bg Message-ID: <1371694802.13762.40.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> Subject: Re: Data Partition Encryption documentation From: Peter Eisentraut To: Adam Vande More Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:20:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Pg-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 15:16 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote: > On this page http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/encryption-options.html, > "gbde" is listed as the method for encrypting block devices. While > correct, "geli" is a much more appropriate mention as it's a more > powerful(e.g. aes-ni support) and secure(more ciphers, data > authentication,etc) solution. Could you provide an updated wording? (E.g., should we just replace gbde by geli, or list both?) -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs