Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBKKpU619372
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:51:31 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBKKpCC13870;
	Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:51:12 -0500 (EST)
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? 
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.3.96.SK.1001220231854.19999R-100000@ra> 
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.SK.1001220231854.19999R-100000@ra>
Comments: In-reply-to Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
	message dated "Wed, 20 Dec 2000 23:42:36 +0300"
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:51:12 -0500
Message-ID: <13867.977345472@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200012/857
X-Sequence-Number: 2386

Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
> Probably we need to add regression test for GiST. 

That would be nice, but let's not hold up the patches for it.

			regards, tom lane