Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XLubq-0000Ye-80 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:46:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XLubp-0001Z0-Hj for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:46:57 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XLubo-0001Yu-Sh for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:46:57 +0000 Received: from nm4-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.97]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XLubg-0006Nq-T2 for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:46:55 +0000 Received: from [98.138.226.179] by nm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Aug 2014 13:46:47 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.199] by tm14.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Aug 2014 13:46:47 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1057.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Aug 2014 13:46:47 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 825895.839.bm@omp1057.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 9463 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Aug 2014 13:46:47 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1408974407; bh=fI/HZKzenO7QW9gfmbqSfF3seAW8wTwa9yWgJte5B4E=; h=References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=mKxZFaJAk+PrgGKdyuZsqVl/9DA7oLmANi1pZCWISrjJYy+Q88jdjRnuSbC9dXL0NY1oMUp37zNXtyNWP0BNToLQkT5y4IJQyieOVLVXCgoZ0Jc3oDbXA40CzkPPZmv7O4uFrBmA/2FneJJKzFpkWBZjd/GMLr136LuZFXuojiQ= X-YMail-OSG: e.1FRPQVM1l4KDrvAVknVTCFm99gpPJYo5Nt.GnBXrRBUm7 9yFMlpBTROhKIMWVuyh6.vqccXNbAgHIXjDKJm1Ov3NT.grAw7iLGRvNknCm bdosmpj3S3slvPHZ879UnPGX7PVXEud2KSfkizLW2Vh7ER7UiAf2vpj_1KV8 bLcjm1P7umo3fHwgk_6YU5hD8VUIoJacaffQGCXX21.f0ufYzXqB7OfVGFLK de3iqboFlw1wgaGLMzD1YPX6HH435iNRROUuYAQsdPW5f_TTsVphnJ6VDYcE V26ZaX6i36HTcm9cLigkh1l1zTdf0tpsbjXD3lfvAca.koFWoXQ.IzMp3pN_ PkJnMF7mpTnQfq1vKBlndQ5B9lewhF9wN6LWMZk6Zg5UxhwIFdG_V4CWoml0 JjWxCVRzDMegG9N.v8ngysbewTXgamAZwJoZFUULEpg4jAxeZv3a0VEIt_Hf k5ggR8oJWtxofi_pgbwQzFdkzTqkKotj0BBkmq5Q0vetld0iLyCKxJT0cUsZ M5CjYwO1xriReTeZnMZHF_uGpvd4FqiHWLT7Gi1DyxTv8ov1mLFOWQ4lWLwz .xqGbHT.4G4_ratNkxLsmPI9orvb.LsntDialH_KbL1J0PUBLC1E5spdJ.66 1sNVVAQ6f6i_Dwlk- Received: from [24.178.25.147] by web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:46:47 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, TWFydGkgUmF1ZHNlcHAgPG1hcnRpQGp1ZmZvLm9yZz4gd3JvdGU6Cgo.IEkgcmFuIHRoZSBUb3B5IHR5cG8tZml4ZXIgKGh0dHBzOi8vZ2l0aHViLmNvbS9pbnRnci90b3B5ICwgdXNpbmcgcnVsZXMKPiBkZXZlbG9wZWQgZm9yIFdpa2lwZWRpYSkgb3ZlciB0aGUgUG9zdGdyZVNRTCBkb2N1bWVudGF0aW9uIGRpcmVjdG9yeS4KPiBBdHRhY2hlZCBpcyBhIHBhdGNoIHdpdGggaGFuZC1waWNrZWQgZml4ZXMgdGhhdCBhcmUgY2xlYXJseSBhbgo.IGltcHJvdmVtZW50Lgo.Cj4gVGhlcmUgYXJlIGFsc28gc29tZSABMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.201.700 References: Message-ID: <1408974407.68725.YahooMailNeo@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:46:47 -0700 From: Kevin Grittner Reply-To: Kevin Grittner Subject: Re: [PATCH] Various documentation typo/grammar fixes To: Marti Raudsepp , pgsql-docs In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pg-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org Marti Raudsepp wrote: > I ran the Topy typo-fixer (https://github.com/intgr/topy , using rules > developed for Wikipedia) over the PostgreSQL documentation directory. > Attached is a patch with hand-picked fixes that are clearly an > improvement. > > There are also some changes that I didn't include that seem somewhat > opinionated, for example: > * "eg" -> "e.g." > * "etc" -> "etc." These two seem to me like they should be changed; otherwise they=20 just don't look correct. > * "the exact same" -> "exactly the same" The old version sounds a bit colloquial to my ear, so it seems like=20 it may be worth changing.=A0 The problem is, this change doesn't seem=20 like it would generally be a direct substitution; it may require a=20 major reorganization of the sentence.=A0 I think the resulting=20 sentences need to be compared to see which is more clear and=20 concise. > * "newly-received" -> "newly received" > * "recently-used" -> "recently used" I think these depend on context.=A0 To me, the former scans better=20 when the combination of words is used as an adjective. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company --=20 Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs