Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3512E004F; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:45:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34282-05; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:45:39 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D975F2E003D; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:45:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3AEjPTk001414; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:45:25 -0400 (EDT) To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Martin Edlman , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, Pg Hackers , Pg Docs , andrew@dunslane.net Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] pl/PgSQL, variable names in NEW In-reply-to: <20080410131602.GF4697@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <47FA034B.7090201@fortech.cz> <162867790804070511y7266c911w370db97a78c3c519@mail.gmail.com> <47FB51C7.6090509@fortech.cz> <20080408132157.GF5290@alvh.no-ip.org> <47FDFB2E.3060503@fortech.cz> <20080410131602.GF4697@alvh.no-ip.org> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:16:02 -0400" Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:45:25 -0400 Message-ID: <1413.1207838725@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200804/10 X-Sequence-Number: 4870 Alvaro Herrera writes: > Question for plperl hackers: Should we remove the mention of DBD::PgSPI > from the PL/Perl manual? It seems like a reasonable suggestion to me, since perl database users probably already know DBD and don't have to learn something new if they go that way. Possibly the text should be reworded, with the mention of DBD::PgSPI put somewhere else or stuck into a or something. regards, tom lane