Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iT62s-0004kG-NN for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:19:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iT62r-0005LD-E5 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:19:29 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iT62r-0005Ks-3j for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:19:29 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iT62k-00080p-Mp for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:19:27 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xA8FJKpO001418; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 10:19:20 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Daniel Gustafsson , Bruce Momjian , brian.williams@mayalane.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced In-reply-to: <20191108150852.GA32585@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20191108150852.GA32585@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Fri, 08 Nov 2019 12:08:52 -0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1416.1573226360.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:19:20 -0500 Message-ID: <1417.1573226360@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > Hmm. Maybe we can say "pristine database" and then add this explanation > in a parenthical comment: > This is particularly handy when restoring a > pg_dump dump: the dump script should be restored in a > pristine database (one where no user-defined objects exist and where > system objects have not been altered), to ensure that one recreates > the correct contents of the dumped database, without conflicting > with objects that might have been added to > template1 later on. So the patch becomes s/virgin/pristine/g plus add a parenthetical definition for the first use? Works for me. regards, tom lane