pg.ddx.io pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedOID
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* OID
@ 2010-12-22 23:30 Leslie S Satenstein <lsatenstein@yahoo.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Leslie S Satenstein @ 2010-12-22 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-docs
I am reading the PDF document and ran into the term OID in the section 4.2.11. Array Constructors
However, OID is first defined in Chapter 5. (5.4 System Columns). Is it reasonable to perhaps move the contents of or repeat part of the contents of section 5.4 in sectioln 4.2.11?
Is this unreferenced term that appears earlier than the definition considered a document bug?.
------------------
Regards
Leslie
Mr. Leslie Satenstein
mailto:lsatenstein@yahoo.com
mailto leslie.satenstein@itbms.biz / leslies@itbms.biz
www.itbms.biz
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: OID
@ 2010-12-23 03:07 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
parent: Leslie S Satenstein <lsatenstein@yahoo.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Lane @ 2010-12-23 03:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leslie S Satenstein <lsatenstein@yahoo.com>; +Cc: pgsql-docs
Leslie S Satenstein <lsatenstein@yahoo.com> writes:
> Is this unreferenced term that appears earlier than the definition considered a document bug?.
No. It would be completely impractical, or at least unintelligible,
to write the manual with no forward references whatsoever.
regards, tom lane
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-23 03:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-22 23:30 OID Leslie S Satenstein <lsatenstein@yahoo.com>
2010-12-23 03:07 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox